"The Lincoln Movie"

I call it “The Lincoln Movie” because some might confuse the title of this article if I just call it by its real name, “Lincoln.” I mean, it is very possible that my blog changed from one of history to automobiles, overnight, right? Yes, you are at hankeringforhistory.com–not hankeringforcars.com–and this post is about the new Steven Spielberg movie.

While I am sure that there are those that went to the Lincoln movie with hopes of claiming that the movie was conjured up by Hollywood executives, bastardizing the real events of Abraham Lincoln, I was not one of those. First off, I am no self-proclaimed expert on President Abraham Lincoln or the Civil War. Second, I understand that the cinema is intended for entertainment and may not be completely accurate. Lastly, I am sure that there are plenty of others attending with the sole purpose of nitpicking, or as historian Harold Holzer, one of the country’s leading authorities on Abraham Lincoln, classified them:

…scholars, nitpickers, trivial pursuit pursuers, and history buffs have all been crowding their local movie theaters this week, many armed with legal pads, in a massive competition to unearth and report every factual error that has crept into the film.

I am not one of those people, and I am sure that there were enough in attendance…they needed no support from me. Unfortunately, if you were hoping that I would call “Lincoln” a travesty, this is not the post you’re looking for.

As far as entertainment goes, I thought the Lincoln movie was an excellent film. Kicking curiosity to the curb, I attempted to abstain from reading reviews of the movie. I wanted to go into the movie knowing as little as possible. I didn’t want to go in with the mindset that Hollywood had ‘botched history.’

Now I did have some of the annoying aforementioned “nitpickers, trivial pursuit pursuers, and history buffs” sitting behind me. I intentionally left them out of the scholars classification, because they were idiots. Let me give you an example of one of their issues.

There is a scene where Abraham Lincoln is riding through a battlefield. You cannot see it in this picture (right), but in shots before and after this picture, there are bodies–everywhere. Hundreds of dead bodies that laid waste to previous day’s battle.

And what was the problem with this scene?

There is no way that they could have stood the stench of the dead bodies. There faces would have been covered with masks.

I kid you not, THAT was the issue that the woman behind me had with the scene. Now, there were some real historical discrepancies that she commented on, but most of them were ridiculous.

I have to say that having such a large interest in history not only made the experience more enjoyable, but I was able to fill in gaps on my own, and recall little tidbits during the movie. In the movie, it was January, 1865, and Robert Todd, son of Abraham Lincoln, was coming home to visit. Because of personal knowledge, I knew that Robert Todd Lincoln almost wasn’t in this part of the movie. It is true. Right before this time, the life of Robert Todd was almost lost. If you aren’t aware of this story, it is worth reading about how the brother of John Wilkes Booth saved the life of Robert Todd Lincoln.

As I was watching this scene, where father and son are reunited (because Robert Todd has been at Harvard), I sit and think. I ponder, “I wonder how the death of another son would have affected Lincoln? Would he have had the strength to carry on and push through the 13th Amendment?” Of course, if you read my blog…you might have thought the same way I was.

Was the movie worth seeing?…yes! The plot of the Lincoln movie flowed well, had an excellent cast, and everyone applauded at the end.

Was it historically accurate?…I am not qualified to make that assessment; however, I can point you in the right direction. Here are some sites that give reviews on the historical accuracy of the movie.

Mount Virtus - Despite Minor Flaws, Spielberg’s Lincoln Worthwhile Viewing for History Geeks

The Daily Beast - What’s True and False in “Lincoln” Movie

The Abraham Lincoln Blog - Film Review: Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln”

http://hankeringforhistory.com/2012/11/26/the-lincoln-movie/

Drunk History

Is that Michael Cera?

Why, yes, yes it is. Michael Cera is portrayed in this picture as Alexander Hamilton.

Interesting, isn’t it?

Would you like to see Will Ferrell, Jim Carrey, Ryan Gosling, Jack Black, Don Cheadle, Michael Cera, Zooey Deschanel, John C. Reilly, Crispin Glover, Jason Ritter and Danny McBride all in one historical extravaganza?

Well you can…sort of.

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas

I ran across an interesting series on Youtube, Drunk History. Yes, it is literally drunk perspectives on history. The tagline for the first in the series is “Witness history as it’s never been told before: Drunk.” With the cast listed above, you can imagine what kind of fun is to be had.

Below is an example of one of the videos. This amazing historical re-telling–and I use the term ‘amazing’ loosely–is of an event that should forever be in the category of “overcoming all odds.” Starring Don Cheadle as Frederick Douglas, Will Ferrell as Abraham Lincoln, and Zooey Deschanel as Mary Lincoln, you can witness just how the events unfolded which directly led to ending slavery, in America.

I think with the influences of alcohol and the fun-loving cast included, it goes without saying that some parental discretion should be afforded.

The above video was number 5 in the series. The rest of the series can be found on HBO’s partner site Funny or Die.

Completely accurate?…not entirely. Well scripted?…not so much. Climatic plot, with lots of twist and turns?…no. However, if SNL-type sketches are your thing, you will probably enjoy the Drunk History series.

Related articles

• New Girl Sneak Peek: Watch Zooey Deschanel Get Into a Boob-Slapping War!
• I went to the White House shortly after tea where I found the original gorilla about as intelligent as ever. What a specimen to be at the head of our affairs now…Gen. George B. McClellan
• Dating Advice From Historical Figures
• 1st debate: Domestic Policy. Romney vs. The Race Card

Drunk History

Brangelina's Engagement Breaks Vow to LGBT

Brad and Angelina

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have decided to tie the knot! When this dynamic-duo started down their hyped-up, A List, Hollywood love story, they proclaimed that until everyone had the right to engage in marriage, they would not get married. Just in the last year, Brad Pitt confirmed their commitment to the cause on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. Whether disheartened because of politics or just smitten with each other, the two have publicly announced that they are engaged. With no hard feelings from the LGBT community, the Communications Director for Equality California stated, "the group is totally behind the Brangelina marriage, even if the right to marry is still not enjoyed by everyone." Having been married only a short time, I can't imagine being in a relationship as long as they have, just to sit idly by and wait for policy change. I commend them for their efforts, but I believe they have waited long enough. Brangelina has been an item for seven-plus years and they have six children. I am glad to see that they have moved on, and now it is time for someone else to carry the torch. Human rights, whether marriages for all or the right to vote, are continually challenged and oppressed. I hope that one day, when faced with the opportunity, I might have the chance to stand up for a worthy cause.